Focus end stop. (purchased for $899), reviewed December 9th, 2006 However, these APOs have a couple of drawbacks. Such "full spectrum" cameras are somewhat more sensitive in the ultraviolet, but much more sensitive in the deep red and infrared. Include the Carl Zeiss in your research though, it might be an interesting lens for you, even if it is a bit pricey for what you get. Only con I can think of, and that may be a big one depending on how you plan to use the lens is the lack of weather sealing. Definitely now on my to-buy list. I bought it for its bokeh. Prime means that this lens is fixed at 135mm, it is not a zoom lens that allows for focal length adjustments. This is huge for me, as it allows me to be much more nimble with getting the right composition and angle. I am a complete amateur at photography in general and this is all new to me so thank you for all the information and videos. BTW, the 300-mm Tele-Tessar you describe -- what camera was it made for? KevinS, in my experience stopping down dramatically improves image quality in terms of chromatic aberration, coma and astigmatism. So whats so great about shooting at 135mm anyway? (37% is difference, so you get little more, about 15.5Mpix) ". This lens flares easily and the flare can be especially ugly if a sun or flash are in the frame. It just doesn't get any better than this! Available 03/21/23. I've owned a few L lenses and while their USM motors have always been quick to snap in focus, this 135mm is on a different level. With todays huge variety of digital sensors, each with their own characteristics, in-camera and post-processing etc., much depends on the given combination of your photo gear to create a certain effect. Any experience with this camera and would this lens be a good fit? When stopped down to 37mm, at F5.4, it also produces perfect, small and round star images across the entire field. Flip on through what we found, and see how the lens performs in the real world in our sample gallery. Nice article for beginners.It's all in the eyes of the beholder. This lens has a long focus adjustment ring, with great tension. As such, it applies most directly here to areas of an image that are out of focus. Samyang 135mm f2, 100mm f2.8, and asperical 16mm f2.8. It is sharp but somehow not that analytic way as a macro lens. The 135mm F2 lens design is truly special, and in this article (and the video I made), I want to try to convince you as well. The moment I tried the Samyang 135mm F2 for the first time after purchasing it, I immediately felt that it was a very special lens. So now your 42Mpix A7rII is only a 10.5Mpix. Does this work well with any of the 1.4x / 1.7x / 2.0x Teleconverters (extenders / barlows)? Also Nikon DC 135mm f/2 is a great lens, a little better than 135mm Canon A specialist lens, at best, though I did enjoy the cat image. No telephoto lens I tested, nor my TSAPO65Q, was suitable for use with a DSLR "clear glass" modified to include deep red and IR. Has a good weight to it. Yet the Jaegers becomes essentially color free when stopped down to 3in. Both the 135 and 200mm Canon l lenses are winners IMHO. This gives me the power of 162x, which is barely sufficient for my 420mm fl APO astrograph at full camera resolution. This is one of the sharpest lens i've ever owned. You're sour grapes man, you wish it were you who wrote the article. It is so sharp it makes you rethink the use of your zoom lenses. And yet this review is on front page of DPReview prompting me to go and buy this lens -- so surely it must be a professional , well grounded review, right? Camera tech for video has come a long way in recent years, with faster autofocus, subject tracking, eye tracking and smarter lenses that stabilize the frame. I just love the lightning fast & accurate focus of this lens. #light_bulb I would disagree. By the way, I still enjoy using my very sharp Sears 135mm, PKA mount lens. I have done a review comparing the sharpness and quality of bokeh to the Canon 70-200 2.8. Valerio, Electronically Assisted Astronomy (No Post-Processing), Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights, DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging, This is not recommended for shared computers, Back to DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging, Buckeyestargazer 2022 in review and New Products. Do I wish it were manufactured with metal? The Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 includes a lens hood, lens pouch, front and rear lens caps, and a 1-year Rokinon manufacturer warranty. I own a 135 since the film days (because you "had to have one" and could not afford much else), still have the zeiss Jena f3.5 M42 and even jumped for the zeiss f2.8 for my yashica when they were sold for next to nothing. (Dpreview), Use the 500 Rule to find the Perfect Exposure Length for Astrophotography, Use a DSLR Ha Filter for Astrophotography, AstroBackyard | Astrophotography Tips and Tutorials2023, Optical Construction: 11 Glass elements in 7 Groups. thanks for the tiring patronising lecture and then agreeing with me. Here is a recent ones taken with the canon xs and a lens. There are quite a few other excellent lenses out there, and nowadays, quite a few that can be used wide open. Several functions may not work. How about the sigma 50mm f1.4 Art? This creates an effective focal length of roughly 200mm, a useful magnification for a wide variety of astro-imaging scenarios. Reducing aperture with the built-in aperture iris interferes with the light path, and results in eight diffraction spikes around bright star images. OK guysTOS rule number one "Posts that are not respectful of other individuals (be they members or not) are not welcome here.". The finish and texture of the Rokinon 135mm F/2 is a step up from the 14mm F/2.8 I ordered a few years ago. With this lens you don't need to do much if any post processing. Samyang should definitely make 135 f2 with the same optical formula and AF for Sony EFF and also Nikon F plus Canon EF mount if possible. The 200f2.8 L is excellent - I am using it right now. Writer Anno Huidekoper takes a look at what this manual SLR can do and how it stacks up to its contemporaries. Let's unbox, review and test this lens to find out why it is one of the best bang for your buck deals in astrophotography! Otherwise, on FF body this lens is wonderful. I use it for everything, landscapes, townscapes, interesting detail, portraits. Rokinon lenses are made in Korea, and so is the Samyang variation. I prefer this lens than the 70-200/2.8. I use it routinely in preference to many other multicoated filters I tested, including the new Hoya MC UV. In fact, a light-weight 200/2.8 seems more interesting to own (e.g., the Minolta 200/2.8). Here's what I see from the photographs:#1: Woman in traffic. here some information (sorry only in italian) http://www.astrovale-usm/index.html You currently have javascript disabled. Interesting that ancient, low-tech (no ED glass, no special coatings) non-apo telephotos could produce decent results compared to something modern. The Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC is one of the most affordable and practical lenses for astrophotography on the market. Let's the games begin! Why take a step back from 250 to sit between the RedCat and the 24-105? The EOS R6 II arrives in one of the most competitive parts of the market, facing off against some very capable competition. I really like how they augment my longer focal length scopes. Ironically all the sample images in this post are painfully soft. Can't argue with your reasoning, Juksu, about the framing of the article, but just stopping by to say I really liked that cat picture, am shopping for a new smartphone, struck that this type of photo is in another league - all newbie observations, of course, which sort of supports your thoughts that an article like this would be better framed as a "Love this new long lens stuff" sort of thing. But for me, the reason to get this lens is the Bokeh and DOF control. With the 135 I imagine I'd have to get up on the roof. That is the story.#7: Leaves.That doesn't work. AHAB. Fantastic IQ & Bokeh. And you can even crop a 135 efl with today's sensors should you actually need it. Due to the weight, at times I didn't move my shooting position and just zoomed to a composition that worked. There's literally no story!#6: Purple Flower.The isolation works because it's the only color. The version I have has the mount for Canon EOS camera bodies, but there are several different lens mounts available on Amazon. Of course, when it comes to astrophotography, this can create some challenges as well. Rain or shine, it's hard to find a camera that does all the OM-5 can for the price. (purchased for $1,100), reviewed August 12th, 2009 Based on my handful of experiences with this lens in the backyard, I have found these traits to hold true. After weeks with a production Fujifilm X-T5, Chris and Jordan have some final thoughts. But again i am just at the beginning and i also do not want to use now a telescope. But this lens changed my mind. I got mine for $60.00 on Craigslist but seen them on eBay for $100 and less all the time. To achieve creamy bokeh, a lens should have a wide maximum aperture and a long focal length. Canon CR-N700 4K PTZ Camera with 15x Zoom. (purchased for $900), reviewed December 14th, 2006 Check out For some reason Samyang makes lenses nobody is asking for. This is a very practical way to plan your next astrophotography project, and especially handy when using a wide field lens like the Rokinon 135mm F/2. This lens provides all of these requirements. here are some links to some pics taken with the lens: They just wanted to increase their joy from photography. In an effort to save money, Id like to start using a Canon 80D that we already own to start picking targets and imaging. I would like to make this work with the Nikkor 180mm ED (i.e., what I have versus what I cannot havelol). If You can afford it, buy it! The 135 L handles this well. http://www.adstateagent.com | http://www.printradiant.com | http://www.hitsticker.com, I love this lens. It always happens to me with Samyang, it makes good glasses, fast and sharp, I want to have them, but they are not comfortable to use, not in Sony E, their focus is not precise, and they are not "so" cheap. (purchased for $900), reviewed April 15th, 2011 Focal length is great. Of the 150 images I considered fit to publish, only 4 were made with the 135. "Bokeru" is a verb, and it can apply equally to to optical and psychological effects, including the reduced mental clarity that can some with age. Recently, the FAA announced that recreational drone pilots in the USA can request LAANC authorization to fly in controlled airspace at night. What you need to know is the author is a hobbyist and hands his images over to px500, the bottom of the barrel so of course he is impressed, he doesnt use top flight gear day in, day out to earn his pay. All content, design, and layout are Copyright 19982023 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. f/2! USM works so quickly and accurately, it puts my 24-70/f2.8L to shame. I would only recommend this lens for casual photographers where missed shot means nothing. They are by nature designed to compromise by magnification and distance, and are therefore not optically optimized at any single setting. I recommend the author change the title of his article from "The Best Telephoto Lenses." to "Some Inexpensive Telephoto Lenses I Have Tested" The original title generates a claim and expectation in the reader that his article can't support that leads to reader frustration and just more questions; why didn't you test this one or do this etc. Super sharp and renders beautiful creamy bokeh. Be careful with the focus. One thing I am most stun is its AF performance. I shoot dozens of weddings every year but the 135mm stayed in my bag a majority of the time; I just didn't find myself needing to use it. A lot of us have been saying this for years. Seems to me that with your gallery and website of images you should refrain from passing judgment on who is and isn't a photography master. As I posted on the Petapixel variant of this article, cropping a 85/1.4 shot to a 135mm-equivalent FoV gives you approx. I also tested 200 f/2.8 tele and it is one of the most perfect lens in existence, as well as the 135. When you buy a lens with fantastic sharpness and image quality at all apertures, you typically expect it to cost $1,200 on up. (purchased for $900), reviewed August 22nd, 2008 If you are a Nikon user, of course have a look at the Nikon AF Nikkor 135mm f/2D DC and compare it to the other lenses mentioned in this article. It improves slightly stopped down. Great lens, but I can't understand why Canon can't control quality. Nothing else like it and the reason the two DC lenses have remained in production since they were introduced in 1993. https://www.dpreview.com/galleries/1180017085/photos/3721717/bokeh. I had both for a while. At least not in my camera (Sony A6000), the focal length in a crop sensor does not make it very suitable for portrait, the photo detail is something else, but without AF that type of photography with that focal distance and at least 80 cm of the subject it requires too much dedication, with how comfortable the DMF approach mode is for that type of photography Also in my mount it does not have any communication with the camera (it does not have a chip, it only has it for Nikon).
Currahee Mountain Caves,
Irvine Regional Park Parking Map,
Clinique 3 Step Acne Solutions,
Articles C
canon 135mm f2 astrophotographyLeave a reply